Morgan v. Drywall Haulers, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MORGAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, V. DRYWALL HAULERS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Morgan v. Drywall Haulers, Inc. (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Motion for discretionary appeal denied. (No. 95-2590 -- Submitted April 15, 1996 -- Decided June 19, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C- 950138. _________ Holbrock, Jonson, Evans & Olivas and Timothy R. Evans, for appellants. Scheper & McGowan and James H. Scheper, for appellees. _________ The cause is before the court on a motion for discretionary appeal. The motion is denied. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., COOK and SRATTON, JJ., concur separately. COOK, J., concurring. Disciplinary Counsel should investigate the professional conduct of attorney Richard Hadden in this case. MOYER, C.J., and STRATTON, J., concur in the foregoing concurring opinion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
