State v. Buskey

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

1 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, V. BUSKEY, APPELLANT. 2 [Cite as State v. Buskey (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 3 Criminal law -- Drug offenses -- R.C. 2925.03(M) and 4507.16(D)(2) do not 4 violate the due process or equal protection provisions of the Ohio 5 and United State Constitutions. 6 (No. 95-1996 -- Submitted June 5, 1996 -- Decided July 3, 1996.) 7 APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APA02- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 198. _________ Michael Miller, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Katherine Press, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Judith M. Stevenson, Franklin County Public Defender, and Paul Skendelas, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. _________ 15 The judgment of the court of appeals, upholding the constitutionality 16 of R.C. 2925.03(M) and 4507.16(D)(2), is affirmed on the authority of State 17 v. Thompkins (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 558, ___ N.E.2d ___. 1 2 MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. 3 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.