State v. DeVoise

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

1 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, V. DEVOISE, APPELLANT. 2 [Cite as State v. DeVoise (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 3 Criminal law -- Drug offenses -- R.C. 2925.11(F)(1) does not violate the 4 due process or equal protection provisions of the Ohio and United 5 States Constitutions. 6 (No. 95-343 -- Submitted June 5, 1996 -- Decided July 3, 1996.) 7 APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, 8 9 10 11 12 No. 14701. _________ Daniel E. Kinane, Montgomery County Public Defender, and Charles L. Grove, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. _________ 1 The judgment of the court of appeals, upholding the constitutionality 2 of R.C. 2925.11(F)(1), is affirmed on the authority of State v. Thompkins 3 (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 558, ___ N.E.2d ___. 4 5 MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. 6 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.