Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
1 NOTTINGHAM 2 NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT. 3 [Cite as Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 4 Insurance -- Motor vehicles -- Pursuant to former R.C. 3937.18, an 5 underinsurance claim must be paid, when -- Determining amount of 6 underinsurance coverage to be paid. 7 (No. 96-101 -- Submitted July 10, 1996 -- Decided August 7, 1996.) 8 APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 9 ET AL., 12 13 14 15 16 V. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; 1995CA00068. _________ 10 11 APPELLEES, Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos, James R. Recupero and David L. Dingwell, for appellees. Robert J. Drexler, for appellant. __________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Cole v. Holland (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___. 17 DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., CONCUR. 18 MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent. 1 STRATTON, J., not participating. 2 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
