Columbus v. Copley

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

1 CITY OF COLUMBUS, APPELLEE, V. COPLEY, APPELLANT. 2 [Cite as Columbus v. Copley (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 3 Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1828 -- Submitted October 9, 1996 -- Decided November 6, 4 5 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APC06- 6 7 756. _________ 8 9 10 11 Ronald J. O Brien, City Attorney, David M. Buchman, City Prosecutor, and Brenda J. Keltner, Assistant City Prosecutor, for appellee. Max Kravitz, for appellant. _________ 12 13 14 15 16 17 The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.