Romp v. Haig
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
1 ROMP ET AL., APPELLEES, V. HAIG, APPELLEE; BAUER COMPANY, APPELLANT. 2 [Cite as Romp v. Haig (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 3 Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently allowed. 4 5 6 7 (No. 95-2059 -- Submitted October 16, 1996 -- Decided December 11, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C- 940268. __________ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 White, Getgey & Meyer Co., L.P.A., and David P. Kamp, for appellees Kenneth and Debbie Romp. Cuni, O Brien & Ferguson Co., L.P.A., Thomas L. Cuni and Amy B. Schott Ferguson, for appellee D. Thomas Haig. Dinsmore & Shohl, Steven H. Schreiber and Sara Simrall Rorer, for appellant. __________ 1 2 3 4 The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. 5 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
