Shidel v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SHIDEL ET AL., APPELLANTS, V. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Shidel v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1664 -- Submitted October 8, 1996 -- Decided December 11, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 94 C.A. 114. __________ Horning & Horning, L.P.A., Richard A. Horning and J. David Horning, for appellants. Oldham & Dowling and Hamilton DeSaussure, Jr., for appellee. __________ The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
