In re Owens

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

1 IN RE OWENS. 2 [Cite as In re Owens (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 3 Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. 4 (No. 94-1806 -- Submitted November 15, 1995 -- Decided January 3, 1996.) 5 APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 66452. 6 ______________ 7 Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, Lynne A. 8 Yohe, Sharon Hawk and Arline M. Zehe, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for 9 appellant Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency. 10 Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Karen Lazorishak, Assistant 11 Attorney General, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Department of Human 12 Services. ______________ 13 14 The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. 15 MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER AND COOK, JJ., concur. 16 DOUGLAS, J., dissents. 17 RESNICK, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of 18 appeals. 1 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.