State v. Said

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

1 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, V. SAID, APPELLEE. 2 [Cite as State v. Said (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 3 Motion for reconsideration dismissed as improvidently granted. 4 5 (No. 93-1085 -- Submitted December 12, 1995 -- Decided January 31, 1996.) 6 APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 92-L-018. 7 ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. ______________ 8 9 Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecuting Attorney, Michael D. 10 Murray, Ariana E. Tarighati and Julie E. Mitrovich, Assistant Prosecuting 11 Attorneys, for appellant. 12 Paul H. Hentemann, for appellee. 13 David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, Randy D. Ashburn and 14 John B. Heasley, Assistant Public Defenders, urging affirmance for amicus 15 curiae, Office of Ohio Public Defender. 16 17 ______________ 1 A motion for reconsideration was granted in this cause on February 2 15, 1995, in 71 Ohio St.3d 1467, 644 N.E.2d 1389, and oral arguments 3 were again presented on December 12, 1995. 4 The motion for reconsideration requesting this court to reconsider its 5 ruling in State v. Said (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 473, 644 N.E.2d 337, is 6 dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently granted. 7 8 9 MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. 10 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.