Olander v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
1 OLANDER, 2 APPELLANT, ET AL. 3 [Cite as Olander v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 4 Insurance -- Motor vehicles -- Pursuant to former R.C. 3937.18, an 5 underinsurance claim must be paid, when -- Determining amount of 6 underinsurance coverage to be paid. 7 (No. 96-59 -- Submitted July 10, 1996 -- Decided August 7, 1996.) 8 APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APE03- 9 10 APPELLEE, V. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 272. _________ 11 Plymale & Associates and Andrew W. Cecil, for appellee. 12 Crabbe, Brown, Jones, Potts & Schmidt, William H. Jones, Stephanie 13 14 15 R. Bostos and Michael R. Henry, for appellant. _________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of 16 Cole v. Holland (1996), ___ 76 Ohio St.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___. 17 DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur 18 MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent. 1 STRATTON, J., not participating. 2 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
