May v. Tandy Corp.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports. May, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Tandy Corporation, Appellee; Diamantis, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. [Cite as May v. Tandy Corp. (1994), Ohio St.3d .] Torts -- Damages -- Collateral benefits -- R.C. 2317.45 violates Sections 2, 5 and 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, and is unconstitutional in toto -Cross-appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 93-1402 -- Submitted January 11, 1994 -- Decided June 1, 1994.) Appeal and Cross-Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 62679. Nurenberg, Plevin, Heller & McCarthy Co., L.P.A., Richard C. Alkire, Jeffrey A. Leikin and Sandra J. Rosenthal, for appellant and cross-appellee. William J. Coyne & Associates Co., L.P.A., Terrance P. Gravens and Michael E. Stinn, for appellee and cross-appellant. The judgment on appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Sorrell v. Thevenir (1994), Ohio St.3d , N.E.2d , decided today. The cross-appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
