Turk v. Trolley Tours of Cleveland, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of
Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27,
1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice
Thomas J. Moyer.
Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S.
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative
Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.
NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the
full texts of the opinions after they have been released
electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.
Turk et al., Appellants, v. Trolley Tours of Cleveland, Inc.,
dba Lolly The Trolley, et al., Appellees.
[Cite as Turk v. Trolley Tours of Cleveland, Inc. (1994),
Ohio St.3d
.]
Torts -- Damages -- Collateral benefits -- R.C. 2317.45
violates Sections 2, 5 and 16, Article I of the Ohio
Constitution, and is unconstitutional in toto.
(No. 93-2019 -- Submitted January 12, 1994 -- Decided June
1, 1994.)
Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, Nos.
62964 and 63087.
Spangenberg, Shibley, Traci, Lancione & Liber, Donald P.
Traci and James A. Marx, for appellants.
Richard R. Kuepper, for appellee Trolley Tours of
Cleveland, Inc.
Arter & Hadden, Irene C. Keyse-Walker, James A. Laurenson
and Kathleen G. Dus, for appellee Dallas & Mavis Forwarding
Company.
The judgment is reversed as to Propositions of Law I and
II and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of
Sorrell v. Thevenir (1994),
Ohio St.3d
,
N.E.2d
,
decided today.
A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer,
JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
