Matter of Bursch v Purchase Coll. of the State Univ. of N.Y.

Annotate this Case
Matter of Bursch v Purchase Coll. of the State Univ. of N.Y. 2019 NY Slip Op 04449 Decided on June 6, 2019 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 6, 2019
No. 63 SSM 8

[*1]In the Matter of Jamael Bursch, Appellant,

v

Purchase College of the State University of New York, et al., Respondents.



Submitted by Peter E. Brill, for appellant.

Submitted by Seth M. Rokosky, for respondents.



MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division insofar as appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the petition insofar as it sought to annul respondents' disciplinary determination granted and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division with directions to remand to respondents for a new disciplinary hearing. Petitioner, a student enrolled at respondent Purchase College of the State University of New York, was accused of multiple disciplinary violations including sexual assault of another student. Petitioner requested a three-hour adjournment of his scheduled administrative hearing so that his attorney could attend the proceeding. Respondents denied this request. Under the particular circumstances of this case, we find respondents abused their discretion as a matter of law by failing to grant the requested adjournment (see Matter of Abdur-Raheem v Mann , 85 NY2d 113, 124 [1995]). Petitioner's remaining arguments need not be reached and any other contentions raised below have been abandoned.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order insofar as appealed from reversed, with costs, and petition insofar as it sought to annul respondents' disciplinary determination granted and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, with directions to remand to respondents for a new disciplinary hearing, in a memorandum. Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur. Chief

Judge DiFiore took no part.

Decided June 6, 2019



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.