City of New York v Tri-Rail Constr., Inc.

Annotate this Case
City of New York v Tri-Rail Constr., Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 07478 Decided on October 17, 2019 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 17, 2019
No. 111 SSM 16

[*1]City of New York, Appellant,

v

Tri-Rail Construction, Inc. et al., Respondents.



Submitted by Aaron M. Bloom, for appellant.

Submitted by Connor W. Fallon, for respondents.



MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint denied.

The City has the general capacity to sue for the negligent destruction of its property (see General City Law § 20 [1]; New York City Charter § 394 [c]). Moreover, the provisions upon which defendants rely do not abrogate the City's claim for damage to its property (see generally Assured Guar. [UK] Ltd. v J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgt. Inc., 18 NY3d 341, 351 [2011]). Defendants have not established that the City lacks a cognizable common law claim.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint denied, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided October 17, 2019



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.