Gaines v City of New York

Annotate this Case
Gaines v City of New York 2017 NY Slip Op 04324 Decided on June 1, 2017 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 1, 2017
No. 87 SSM 8

[*1]Clarence Gaines, as the Executor of the Estate of Janie Gaines, Deceased, Respondent,

v

City of New York, et al., Defendants, Department of Social Services of the City of New York, Appellant.



Submitted by Eric Lee, for appellant.

Submitted by Tamara L. Stack, for respondent.



On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. Under the circumstances of this case, a valid supplemental needs trust was never effected. Claimants did not argue before Supreme Court that the trust was not a lifetime trust governed by EPTL 7-1.17 and EPTL 7-1.18. That argument is, therefore, unpreserved for our review. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.

Decided June 1, 2017



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.