Matter of Ming Tung v China Buddhist Assn.
Annotate this Case
Matter of Ming Tung v China Buddhist Assn.
2016 NY Slip Op 01210
Decided on February 18, 2016
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on February 18, 2016
No. 73 SSM 2
[*1]In the Matter of Ming Tung, et al., Appellants,
v
China Buddhist Association, et al., Respondents.
Decided on February 18, 2016
No. 73 SSM 2
[*1]In the Matter of Ming Tung, et al., Appellants,
v
China Buddhist Association, et al., Respondents.
Submitted by Alexander P. Kelly, for appellants.
Submitted by Joseph Milano, for respondents.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Judith J. Gische at the Appellate Division, First Department (124 AD3d 13 [2014]), and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided February 18, 2016
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
