Thomas v New York City Hous. Auth.
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 4, 2015
No. 149 SSM 12
[*1]Calvin E. Thomas, Respondent,
v
New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.
Submitted by Patrick J. Lawless, for appellant.
Submitted by Blake G. Goldfarb, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that court, and certified question answered in the negative. The allegations in the notice of claim were not sufficient to put defendant on notice of the allegations in the bill of particulars concerning the handrail. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.
Decided June 4, 2015
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
