People v Ingram

Annotate this Case
People v Ingram 2014 NY Slip Op 08763 Decided on December 16, 2014 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 16, 2014
No. 235 SSM 24

[*1]The People & c., Appellant,

v

Robert L. Ingram, Respondent.



Submitted by David A. Heraty, for appellant.

Submitted by Sherry A. Chase, for respondent.



[*2]

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The determination as to whether police have reasonable suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods , 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division's resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court's further review.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Decided December 16, 2014



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.