Robles v New York City Hous. Auth.
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 10, 2014
No. 175 SSM 11
[*1]Guillermo Robles, Appellant,
v
New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.
Submitted by Susan R. Nudelman, for appellant.
Submitted by Joseph C. Fegan, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint denied. The Appellate Division improperly concluded that defendant was entitled to summary judgment, as defendant failed to show that it was prejudiced by any defect in plaintiff's notice of claim (see generally General Municipal Law § 50-e [6]), and triable issues of fact remain.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided June 10, 2014
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
