People v Myers

Annotate this Case
People v Myers 2013 NY Slip Op 08292 Decided on December 12, 2013 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 12, 2013
No. 259 SSM 38

[*1]The People & c., Respondent,

v

Ariel Myers, Appellant.




Submitted by Eugene P. Grimmick, for appellant.
Submitted by Roman Griffith, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Under the facts of this case, the admission of evidence of an uncharged crime [*2]allegedly committed by defendant for the purpose of establishing defendant's identity constituted an abuse of discretion (see People v Robinson, 68 NY2d 541, 549-550 [1986]; People v Molineux, 168 NY 264, 293 [1901]). Because the evidence of defendant's guilt is not overwhelming, the error is not harmless.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed and a new trial ordered, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided December 12, 2013

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.