Bruno Kearney Architects, LLP v Rose
Annotate this Case
Bruno Kearney Architects, LLP v Rose
2013 NY Slip Op 05776
Decided on September 10, 2013
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on September 10, 2013
No. 243 SSM 22
[*1]Bruno Kearney Architects, LLP, Appellant,
v
Lisa Rose, Respondent.
Submitted by John M. Rondello, Jr., for appellant.
Submitted by Donald R. Hammil, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute dismissing the complaint granted upon plaintiff's stipulation. The Appellate Division correctly determined that plaintiff was not entitled to recovery against defendant. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Judge Rivera took no part.
Decided September 10, 2013
Decided on September 10, 2013
No. 243 SSM 22
[*1]Bruno Kearney Architects, LLP, Appellant,
v
Lisa Rose, Respondent.
Submitted by John M. Rondello, Jr., for appellant.
Submitted by Donald R. Hammil, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute dismissing the complaint granted upon plaintiff's stipulation. The Appellate Division correctly determined that plaintiff was not entitled to recovery against defendant. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Judge Rivera took no part.
Decided September 10, 2013
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
