People v McFarlane

Annotate this Case
People v McFarlane 2013 NY Slip Op 05763 Decided on August 29, 2013 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 29, 2013
No. 242 SSM 21

[*1]The People & c., Appellant,

v

Terrence McFarlane, Respondent.




Submitted by Stanley R. Kaplan, for appellant.
Respondent, precluded.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination as to [*2]whether a defendant has consented to a search involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Valerio, 95 NY2d 924, 925 [2000]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division's resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court's further review (id.).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided August 29, 2013

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.