People v Rodriguez

People v Rodriguez 2013 NY Slip Op 05719 Decided on August 27, 2013 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 27, 2013
No. 241 SSM 20

[*1]The People & c., Respondent,

v

Julio Rodriguez, Appellant.




Submitted by Lisa A. Packard, for appellant.
Submitted by Patricia Curran, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to preserve his claim that he did not receive 20 days notice prior to his sex offender designation proceeding as required under Correction Law § 168-n (3). His argument that an adjournment of unspecified duration was required as a matter of due process is [*2]similarly unreviewable.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided August 27, 2013