Dzielski v Essex Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
Dzielski v Essex Ins. Co. 2012 NY Slip Op 04279 Decided on June 5, 2012 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 5, 2012
No. 149 SSM 22

[*1]Mark Dzielski et al., Respondents,

v

Essex Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.




Submitted by Dan D. Kohane, for appellant.
Submitted by Kathleen M. Reilly, for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment denied, defendant's motion for summary judgment granted, and judgment granted to defendant declaring that it has no obligation to indemnify its insured in the underlying personal injury action, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (90 AD3d 1493, 1495-1497 [2011]). Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
Decided June 5, 2012

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.