Bready v CSX Transp., Inc.

Annotate this Case
Bready v CSX Transp., Inc. 2012 NY Slip Op 03476 Decided on May 3, 2012 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 3, 2012
No. 145 SSM 18

[*1]Frederick Bready et al., Appellants,

v

CSX Transportation, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant. No. 146 SSM 19



Brandon Harris et al., Appellants,

v

CSX Transportation, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.




For Each Case:
Submitted by Edward J. Markarian, for appellants.
Submitted by Dan Himmelfarb, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM: [*2]

The order of the Appellate Division in each case, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs. Assuming without deciding that defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. owed plaintiffs a higher duty of care under the Federal Employer's Liability Act than under the common law, defendant made a prima facie showing that it did not breach that duty of care. Plaintiffs, in response, failed to establish that a triable issue of fact existed on the issue of breach of the duty of care. Accordingly, the Appellate Division properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in each case.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
For Each Case: On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
Decided May 3, 2012

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.