Kaur v American Tr. Ins. Co.
Annotate this Case
Kaur v American Tr. Ins. Co.
2012 NY Slip Op 03362
Decided on May 1, 2012
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on May 1, 2012
No. 142 SSM 12
[*1]Sarbjeet Kaur, & c., Respondent,
v
American Transit Insurance Company, et al., Defendants, Baker, McEvoy, Morrisey & Moskovits, P.C., Appellant.
Submitted Ronald W. Weiner, for appellant.
Submitted by Edward Sivin, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, order of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated and certified question answered in the negative. Triable issues of fact exist concerning defendant-appellant's successor liability (see Schumacher v Richards Shear Co., 59 NY2d 239, 245 [1983]). Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
Decided May 1, 2012
Decided on May 1, 2012
No. 142 SSM 12
[*1]Sarbjeet Kaur, & c., Respondent,
v
American Transit Insurance Company, et al., Defendants, Baker, McEvoy, Morrisey & Moskovits, P.C., Appellant.
Submitted Ronald W. Weiner, for appellant.
Submitted by Edward Sivin, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, order of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated and certified question answered in the negative. Triable issues of fact exist concerning defendant-appellant's successor liability (see Schumacher v Richards Shear Co., 59 NY2d 239, 245 [1983]). Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
Decided May 1, 2012
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
