Cecilia Teodorescu v. Resnick & Binder, P.C.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------No. 39 Cecilia Teodorescu, Appellant, v. Resnick & Binder, P.C., Respondent. Lawrence B. Lame, for appellant. John J. Kelleher, for respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Order reversed, with costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment denied. We hold, contrary to the Appellate Division, that plaintiff raised issues of fact regarding whether she could have prevailed on a theory of constructive notice. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur. Decided March 25, 2010 *
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
