In the Matter of Thomas Anderson v. Town of Chili Planning Board and Metalico Rochester, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------No. 173 SSM 17 In the Matter of Thomas Anderson, et al., Appellants, v. Town of Chili Planning Board and Metalico Rochester, Inc., Respondents. Submitted by Janet D. Callahan, for appellants. Submitted by Keith E. O'Toole, for respondent Town of Chili Planning Board. Submitted by Jeffrey J. Harridine, for respondent Metalico Rochester, Inc. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, respondent Planning Board's determinations issuing a conditional use permit and a negative declaration annulled and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, with directions to remand to the Planning Board for further proceedings for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (59 AD3d 1017, 1019-1020 [2009]). Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur. Decided June 30, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
