Johnson v Kling

Annotate this Case
Johnson v Kling 2008 NY Slip Op 04952 [10 NY3d 887] June 5, 2008 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 6, 2008

[*1] Chevonna Johnson, Appellant,
v
Susan Kling et al., Defendants, and GMAC Leasing Corp. et al., Respondents.

Decided June 5, 2008

Johnson v Kling, 48 AD3d 637, reversed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Alexander J. Wulwick, New York City, and Schwartzapfel Truhowsky Marcus Sachs, P.C., Huntington, for appellant.

Bivona & Cohen, P.C., New York City (Anthony J. McNulty, Roderick J. Coyne and Adam J. Silbert of counsel), for respondents.

{**10 NY3d at 888} OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, motion of defendants GMAC Leasing Corp., General Motors Acceptance Corp. and Vaul Trust Corp. to dismiss the complaint against them denied, and certified question answered in the negative (see Jones v Bill, 10 NY3d 550 [2008] [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. .

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.