Horsford v Bacott

Annotate this Case
Horsford v Bacott 2007 NY Slip Op 01426 [8 NY3d 874] February 22, 2007 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 25, 2007

[*1] Claude Horsford et al., Respondents,
v
Yvonne Bacott, Appellant, and "John Doe" et al., Respondents.

Decided February 22, 2007

Horsford v Bacott, 32 AD3d 310, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Legal Aid Society, New York City (Alan Canner and Afua Atta-Mensah of counsel), for appellant.

Gary J. Wachtel, New York City, for Claude Horsford and another, respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division correctly concluded that the factual determination on which the Civil Court judgment was based is supported by sufficient evidence.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.