Lempert v Steinberg & Pokoik Mgt. Corp.
Annotate this Case[*1] Cathy Lempert, Appellant,
v
Steinberg & Pokoik Management Corp. et al., Respondents.
Decided December 21, 2006
Lempert v Steinberg & Pokoik Mgt. Corp., 32 AD3d 215, reversed.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Friedman & James LLP, New York City (John P. James of counsel), for appellant.
Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., New York City (Linda M. Brown of counsel), for respondents.
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and defendants' motion for summary judgment denied. Questions of fact exist concerning whether a slippery substance on the floor caused plaintiff's injuries and, if so, whether defendants' negligence created the condition.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo and Pigott. Judges Rosenblatt, Read and Smith dissent and vote to affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum by the Appellate Division (32 AD3d 215 [2006]). [*2]
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.