Michael S. Bennett v Kissing Bridge Corporation

Annotate this Case
Bennett v Kissing Bridge Corp. 2005 NY Slip Op 06636 [5 NY3d 812] September 13, 2005 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. As corrected through Wednesday, November 16, 2005

[*1] Michael S. Bennett et al., Appellants,
v
Kissing Bridge Corporation, Respondent.

Decided September 13, 2005

Bennett v Kissing Bridge Corp., 17 AD3d 990, affirmed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Smith, Keller, Miner & O'Shea, Buffalo (Philip J. O'Shea, Jr., of counsel), for appellants.

Damon & Morey LLP, Buffalo (Brian A. Birenbach of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (17 AD3d 990).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.