Schulz v. New York State Legislature

Annotate this Case

92 N.Y.2d 917 (1998)

Robert L. Schulz et al., Appellants, v. New York State Legislature et al., Respondents. City of New York et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted August 31, 1998

Decided September 22, 1998.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, LEVINE and CIPARICK each respectively denies the referred motion for disqualification.

Motion to disqualify Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Levine and Ciparick dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no authority to entertain the motion made on nonstatutory grounds. The application seeking recusal is referred to the Judges for individual consideration and determination by each Judge (see, Matter of Sims, 62 N.Y.2d 884; New York Criminal & Civ. Cts. Bar Assn. v State of New York, 46 N.Y.2d 730; Matter of Waltemade, 37 NY2d [a], [ll]).

On the Court's own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.