Melino v. Lauster

Annotate this Case

82 N.Y.2d 828 (1993)

625 N.E.2d 589

605 N.Y.S.2d 4

Michelle Melino, Appellant, v. Rhonda L. Lauster et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 22, 1993.

Lewis & Stanzione, Catskill (Ralph C. Lewis, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Edward B. Downey, Albany, and Kris T. Jackstadt for respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and JUDGES SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (195 AD2d 653).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.