MATTER OF BODDIE v. County of Westchester

Annotate this Case

33 N.Y.2d 835 (1973)

In the Matter of James Boddie, Appellant-Respondent, v. County of Westchester et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 15, 1973.

Decided December 27, 1973.

John J. S. Mead, County Attorney (Alfred J. Mungo of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Alfred Olsen for appellant-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, JONES and WACHTLER. Judge BREITEL dissents and votes to reverse in the following opinion in which Judges JASEN and GABRIELLI concur.

*837On respondents' appeal: Order affirmed, without costs.

BREITEL, J. (dissenting in part).

The finding by the commissioner, invulnerable to judicial review, that appellant Boddie waved a loaded revolver at inmates under his charge in a local jail not only merited dismissal of Boddie, but would merit complaint against the commissioner if he retained Boddie in so sensitive a position. The waving of a loaded revolver at the inmates demonstrated unfitness for the position, and the sanction imposed was therefore proper (cf. Matter of Traber v. Feinstein, 39 A D 2d 643, affd. 32 N Y 2d 860). Moreover, it is suggested that humane considerations on behalf of helpless persons in custody should outweigh sympathy for a custodian who is so insensitive to his responsibility.

Accordingly, I dissent and vote to reverse on the commissioner's appeal and to reinstate his determination.

Order affirmed.

On petitioner's appeal: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the grounds that petitioner was not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]) and no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.