Dicenzo v. New York Shovel & Crane Corp.
Annotate this Case308 N.Y. 871 (1955)
Sam Dicenzo, as Administrator of The Estate of Albert Dicenzo, Deceased, Appellant, v. New York Shovel & Crane Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued February 25, 1955.
Decided March 11, 1955
Arthur Karger, Milton Boxer and Harry H. Lipsig for appellant.
Samuel Gottesman and Harold H. Wolgel for respondent.
Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ. Taking no part: FULD, J.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
