Matter of Gray v. Town Bd., N. Hempstead

Annotate this Case

303 N.Y. 575 (1952)

In the Matter of A. Freeman Gray et al., Appellants, v. Town Board of the Town of North Hempstead, Nassau County, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 25, 1952.

Decided March 14, 1952

Charles Kingsley and Joseph P. Kissling for appellants.

James L. Dowsey, Jr., Town Attorney (Bertram B. Daiker of counsel), for respondents.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ., concur.

*576Per Curiam.

We hold that any signer of a petition described in section 191 of the Town Law has a right, up to the time such petition is acted on by the town board by the publication or posting of a notice of hearing (Town Law, ยง 194), to withdraw and revoke his signature by filing with the town clerk a duly acknowledged statement of such withdrawal and revocation (see People ex rel. Irwin v. Sawyer, 52 N.Y. 296; People ex rel. Yawger v. Allen, 52 N.Y. 538). *577 Nothing to the contrary was held in People ex rel. McGrath v. Weiss (216 App. Div. 505, affd. 245 N.Y. 518) since in that instance the attempted withdrawal of signatures was by a petition which was not presented to the town board until the time of its hearing, and thus a considerable time after the town board had taken jurisdiction of the original petition by publishing and posting notice of such hearing (see Matter of Floyd-Jones v. Town Bd. of Oyster Bay, 249 N.Y. 398, 405).

The orders should be reversed, with costs in all courts, and the determination of the town board annulled.

Orders reversed, etc.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.