State v. Villalobos (Unpublished Opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computergenerated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Filing Date: June 24, 2019 NO. S-1-SC-37103 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. BRANDON VILLALOBOS, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY James Lawrence Sanchez, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General John Kloss, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellant and Cross-Appellee Jeffrey J. Buckels Albuquerque, NM for Appellee and Cross-Appellant DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE {1} WHEREAS, this matter having come before the Court upon the State’s appeal of an order suppressing evidence pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 39-3-3(B)(2) (1972) and; {2} The Court having considered the briefs, engaged in oral argument, and being otherwise fully informed on the issues and applicable law and; {3} The Court finding that there is no reasonable likelihood that a decision or formal opinion of the Court, under the instant facts, would materially advance the law of the State and; {4} The Court exercising its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)(2) NMRA to dispose of a case by order, decision, or memorandum opinion rather than formal opinion; {5} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the district court to suppress all of Defendant’s statements made after the Miranda warnings is AFFIRMED; {6} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court need not address (1) the State’s argument that the district court erred by suppressing all statements made after Defendant was handcuffed on the additional ground that those statements were not voluntary or (2) Defendant’s argument, made pursuant to Rule 12-201(C) NMRA, that warnings should have been given earlier under NMSA 1978, Section 32A-2-14 (2009). {7} IT IS SO ORDERED. BARBARA J. VIGIL, Justice MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Justice C. SHANNON BACON, Justice DAVID K. THOMSON, Justice DISSENTING. JUDITH K. NAKAMURA, Chief Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
