STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CURTIS ALEXANDER
Annotate this CaseRECORD IMPOUNDED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-6067-12T2
STATE OF NEW JERSEY,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
CURTIS ALEXANDER, a/k/a MALIK TERROD,
Defendant-Appellant.
_____________________________________________
December 11, 2014
Submitted October 21, 2014 Decided
Before Judges Fisher and Manahan.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 02-02-0676.
Curtis Alexander, appellant pro se.
Carolyn A. Murray, Acting Essex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Andrew R. Burroughs, Special Deputy Attorney General/Acting Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Defendant, Curtis Alexander, a/k/a Malik Terrod1, appeals from an order denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence.
We have considered the issues raised by defendant in light of the record, the procedural history, the applicable law and the written decision dated March 28, 2013, of Judge Michael A. Petrolle. We conclude that none of the issues are of sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2).
Suffice it to say, defendant's present claim was adjudicated on direct appeal. State v. Alexander, No. A-0015-06 (App. Div. Oct. 18, 2007), certif. denied, 195 N.J. 520 (2008). It was also adjudicated on appeal from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Alexander, No. A-5818-09 (App. Div. May 26, 2011) (slip op. at 6), certif. denied, 208 N.J. 372 (2011).
Affirmed.
1 Defendant is also known as "Marlon Timmons" as referenced on the Judgment of Conviction and within the respondent's brief.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.