RIDDHI SIDDHI ASSOCIATES, LLC v. VOORHEES TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0

RIDDHI SIDDHI ASSOCIATES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant/

Cross-Respondent,

and

BART KHATIWALA,

Plaintiff,

v.

VOORHEES TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD,

Defendant-Respondent/

Cross-Appellant,

and

MAYOR AND TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF

THE TOWNSHIP OF VOORHEES, and

MORI PROPERTIES, LLC,

Defendants-Respondents.

________________________________________

December 18, 2014

 

Argued September 15, 2014 Decided

Before Judges Lihotz, Espinosa and Rothstadt.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No. L-1054-11.

Jeffrey I. Baron argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Baron & Brennan, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Baron and Jeffrey M. Brennan, on the brief).

Eric J. Riso argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Platt & Riso, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Riso, on the brief).

Daniel H. Long argued the cause for respondents Mayor and Township Committee of the Township of Voorhees (Wade, Long, Wood & Kennedy, LLC, attorneys; Leonard J. Wood, Jr., on the brief).

Barry N. Lozuke argued the cause for respondent Mori Properties, LLC (Zane & Lozuke, attorneys; Mr. Lozuke, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Appeal dismissed.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.