RIDDHI SIDDHI ASSOCIATES, LLC v. VOORHEES TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-0
RIDDHI SIDDHI ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant/
Cross-Respondent,
and
BART KHATIWALA,
Plaintiff,
v.
VOORHEES TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD,
Defendant-Respondent/
Cross-Appellant,
and
MAYOR AND TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF
THE TOWNSHIP OF VOORHEES, and
MORI PROPERTIES, LLC,
Defendants-Respondents.
________________________________________
December 18, 2014
Argued September 15, 2014 Decided
Before Judges Lihotz, Espinosa and Rothstadt.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No. L-1054-11.
Jeffrey I. Baron argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Baron & Brennan, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Baron and Jeffrey M. Brennan, on the brief).
Eric J. Riso argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Platt & Riso, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Riso, on the brief).
Daniel H. Long argued the cause for respondents Mayor and Township Committee of the Township of Voorhees (Wade, Long, Wood & Kennedy, LLC, attorneys; Leonard J. Wood, Jr., on the brief).
Barry N. Lozuke argued the cause for respondent Mori Properties, LLC (Zane & Lozuke, attorneys; Mr. Lozuke, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Appeal dismissed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.