Conflict of Interest Municipal Prosecutor Prosecuting Police at Hearing

Annotate this Case

102 N.J.L.J. 451
November 16, 1978

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
 
Appointed by the New Jersey Supreme Court
 

OPINION 410

Conflict of Interest
Municipal Prosecutor
Prosecuting Police at Hearing

The inquirer asks whether there is a conflict of interest when a municipal prosecutor represents the police department at a departmental hearing of charges against a municipal police officer.
It is our opinion that there is a conflict of interest and that it is unethical for the municipal prosecutor to perform this function. We rely upon our Opinion 400, 102 N.J.L.J. 73 (1978), in reaching this conclusion. The municipal prosecutor frequently works with the police officers in the municipality. The manner in which facts are presented would be the decision of the prosecutor and frequently the manner of presentation can make a significant difference in the result. Thus the prosecutor is placed in a conflict of interest situation regarding the presenting of appropriate facts to support charges against a police officer in his municipality. Furthermore, it is conceivable that the police officers in the municipality would find it difficult at times to
work with a municipal prosecutor who could possibly be in the position at some future time of presenting charges against them.
Therefore, even though the public is not present during a department hearing, the same conflict of interest considered in our Opinion 400, supra, would be present.

* * *
 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.