New Jersey Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Decisions

Browse Opinions From the New Jersey Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics

Recent Decisions From the New Jersey Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics
Donating Legal Services to Charity Fundraisers; Superseding Opinion 319
Date: December 9, 2020
Docket Number: acp737-1
Responding to Negative Online Reviews
Date: December 9, 2020
Docket Number: acp738-1
Ethical Responsibilities of Lawyers Who Use Third Party Vendors to Electronically File Documents
Date: September 20, 2018
Docket Number: acp7341 Lawyers may use third party vendors to electronically file documents, but must use reasonable care in selecting the vendor to insure ...
Former Client Conflict of Interest; Lawyer at Law Firm That Represented Planning Board in Litigation Joining Firm that Represented Adverse Party
Date: December 13, 2017
Docket Number: acp7331 The Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics received an inquiry from a lawyer who works for a law firm that represented a municipal planning board in lengthy and contentious litigation, a portion of which is still pending. A partner at the firm served as legal counsel for the planning board and Inquirer assisted the partner in various aspects of the litigation. The partner retired and the firm no longer serves as counsel for the planning board. Inquirer asked whether, if she leaves her current firm and joins the law firm that represents the adverse party in this litigation, there would be any restrictions on her practice or that of her new firm.
ERISA-Governed Health Benefits Plans and Subrogation Agreements
Date: September 19, 2013
Docket Number: acp727-1
Conflict of Interest - Government Lawyers
Date: June 24, 2013
Docket Number: acp726-1
Selling Law Firm Accounts Receivable to a Third Party or Retaining a Collection Agency For Collection of Fees Payable by Former Clients
Date: March 7, 2012
Docket Number: acp7231
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites. These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.