State v. Coleman
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury-waived trial, Defendant was convicted of second-degree robbery. Defendant was sentenced as a persistent offender to ten years’ imprisonment. Defendant appealed, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction because he did not forcibly steal the money through the use or threatened use of force. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that there was sufficient evidence supporting the trial court’s finding that Defendant committed the crime of second-degree robbery because he forcibly stole the money by means of an actual or attempted threat.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.