Reinstatement of Blair

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 44 September Term, 2017 _____________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF WALTER LLOYD BLAIR TO THE BAR OF MARYLAND _____________________________________ Greene Adkins Watts Getty Harrell, Jr. Glenn T. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) Battaglia, Lynne A. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) Raker, Irma S. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ. _____________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________ Filed: July 13, 2018 2018-07-13 11:36-04:00 IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF WALTER LLOYD BLAIR TO THE BAR OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG, No. 44 September Term, 2017 ORDER Upon the consideration of the Petition for Reinstatement to the Bar of Maryland filed on December 1, 2017 by Walter Lloyd Blair, and Bar Counsel’s response thereto filed on January 30, 2018; and WHEREAS, Petitioner was suspended from the practice of law in this State by this Court’s Order o f J u l y 2 1 , 2 0 1 0 i n t h e c a s e of Attorney Grievance Commission v. Walter Lloyd Blair, Misc. Docket AG No. 83, September Term, 2009; and WHEREAS, this Court’s July 21, 2010 Order was a temporary suspension order entered pursuant to former Maryland Rule 16-771(c), then in effect for disciplinary or remedial actions initiated upon an attorney’s conviction of a serious crime; and WHEREAS, oral arguments having been held in these matters; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner having been disbarred this date in an opinion issued by this Court in the underlying disciplinary or remedial action docketed as Misc. Docket AG No. 83, September Term, 2009, NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 13th day of July, 2018, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals o f Maryland, that the Petition for Reinstatement be, and it is hereby, DENIED. /s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.