Maryland Supreme Court Decisions
Located in Annapolis, the Maryland Supreme Court is the highest court in Maryland. (It was known as the Maryland Court of Appeals until December 14, 2022, when a constitutional amendment changed its name.) The Court issues rules of administration, practice, and procedure that govern lower courts and the legal profession in Maryland. In addition to answering broad legal questions, it holds exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving certain issues. These include appeals from a death sentence, challenges to legislative redistricting, and matters related to the removal of elected officials. The Court also oversees disciplinary proceedings for attorneys and judges.
To serve as a judge on the Maryland Supreme Court, a candidate must be at least 30 years old at the time of their appointment and admitted to practice law in the state. A candidate also must be a citizen and a qualified voter in Maryland, a resident of the state for at least five years, and a resident of the judicial circuit to which they are appointed for at least six months. Seven judges serve on the Court, representing each of the state’s seven appellate judicial circuits. The Governor of Maryland appoints each judge, but the Maryland Senate must confirm them. To remain on the Court after their appointment, they must win a retention election at least one year later. Each judge serves a 10-year term. Judges in Maryland must retire when they turn 70.
A judge may be removed from the Maryland Supreme Court if they are impeached by the House of Delegates and convicted by two-thirds of the Senate. They also may be removed by the Governor upon the address of the General Assembly if the Governor obtains the agreement of two-thirds of the House of Delegates and two-thirds of the Senate. In other cases, the Supreme Court may remove one of its judges if the Commission on Judicial Disabilities recommends this measure. The General Assembly also has the authority to retire a judge upon a two-thirds vote in each house, combined with the concurrence of the Governor.
- 2024 (28)
- 2023 (109)
- 2022 (139)
- 2021 (171)
- 2020 (153)
- 2019 (141)
- 2018 (166)
- 2017 (198)
- 2016 (178)
- 2015 (183)
- 2014 (216)
- 2013 (247)
- 2012 (227)
- 2011 (241)
- 2010 (186)
- 2009 (176)
- 2008 (173)
- 2007 (207)
- 2006 (211)
- 2005 (203)
- 2004 (200)
- 2003 (227)
- 2002 (192)
- 2001 (143)
- 2000 (134)
- 1999 (148)
- 1998 (132)
- 1997 (127)
- 1996 (108)
- 1995 (116)
- 1993 (1)
- 1992 (1)
- 1991 (1)
- 1990 (1)
- 1988 (1)
- 1986 (1)
- 1981 (2)
- 1979 (1)
- 1977 (1)
- 1975 (1)
- 1949 (1)
- 1931 (1)
Recent Decisions From the Maryland Supreme Court
Date: April 19, 2024
Docket Number: 5/23
Justia Opinion Summary: This case involves a dispute between a homeowner and a citizens association over a parcel of undeveloped land. The parcel was divided into two sections by a stone wall. The homeowner claimed adverse possession over the…
Date: March 25, 2024
Docket Number: 12/23
Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court of Maryland held that the State's duty to preserve scientific identification evidence, such as DNA, is limited to specific crimes specified in the Criminal Procedure Article ("CP") § 8-201(j)(1)(ii) and…
Date: March 25, 2024
Docket Number: 4/23
Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court of Maryland has ruled that the term "rent" under Real Property § 8-401, as applied to residential leases, refers to the fixed, periodic payments a tenant is required to make for use or occupancy of a…
Date: March 21, 2024
Docket Number: 11/23
Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court of Maryland reviewed a decision by the Maryland Public Service Commission ("Commission") that approved a rate increase for the Washington Gas and Light Company ("Washington Gas"). The rate increase came…
Date: February 23, 2024
Docket Number: 11/23
Justia Opinion Summary: In a dispute regarding a Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) decision to approve a rate increase for Washington Gas and Light Company (Washington Gas), the Supreme Court of Maryland held that a reviewing court must…
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.