Oken v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Nos. 33 and 34 September Term, 2003 ______________________________ STEVEN HOWARD OKEN v. STATE OF MARYLAND ______________________________ Bell, C.J. Raker Wilner Cathell Harrell Battaglia Greene, JJ. ___________________________________ PER CURIAM ORDER Bell, C.J., Dissents. ___________________________________ Filed: June 14, 2004 STEVEN HOWARD OKEN * Court of Appeals * of Maryland v. * * STATE OF MARYLAND Misc. Nos. 33 and 34 September Term, 2003 PER CURIAM ORDER The Court having considered the Motion for Stay of Warrant of Execution and Request for Immediate Hearing, the Application for Leave to Appeal from the denial of a motion to reopen the post-conviction case, the State s response to the Motion and Application and Oken s response to the State s answer, it is this 14th day of June, 2004, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Motion and Application be, and they are hereby, DENIED. /s/ Irma S. Raker SENIOR JUDGE Chief Judge Bell dissents and would grant the Application for Leave to Appeal and the requested Stay.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
