State v. Vasquez
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the district court summarily denying Defendant's motions to correct illegal sentences for three counts of first-degree murder and other crimes, holding that Defendant's claims failed.
Defendant brought a series of pro se motions attacking his convictions. The district court consolidated the motions and summarily denied them, concluding that none of the motions raised a substantial issue of law or fact that would support the grounds for relief allowed under Kan. Stat. Ann. 22-3504. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district judge did not err in summarily denying Defendant's motions to correct an illegal sentence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.