State v. Hankins
Annotate this CaseAppellant pled guilty to multiple felony charges and was sentenced to sixty-eight months’ imprisonment. Appellant later filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence, asserting that his criminal history score should not have included an Oklahoma nonperson felony because he received a deferred judgment for that crime, which did not constitute a conviction for criminal history scoring purposes. The district court denied the motion. The court of appeals affirmed, holding that the invited error doctrine barred Appellant’s challenge to his criminal history score. The Supreme Court reversed, holding (1) Appellant illegal sentence challenge was subject to appellate review; and (2) a successfully completed Oklahoma deferred judgment is not to be counted as a conviction when calculating a Kansas criminal history score. Remanded for resentencing.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.