State v. Baker
Annotate this CaseDefendant pled guilty to four crimes arising from the abuse of his girlfriend's nineteen-month-old son, resulting in the child's death. The district court ran Defendant's sentences for the four crimes, which included child abuse and felony murder, consecutive to one another. The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's sentences, holding (1) the judge did not abuse his discretion in imposing consecutive sentences, as a reasonable person could agree with the judge's conclusion that consecutive sentences were appropriate; and (2) Defendant's sentence of 128 months' imprisonment for child abuse did not violate his constitutional rights as recognized in Apprendi v. New Jersey.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.