State v. Antrim
Annotate this CaseAfter pleading no contest to three counts of aggravated indecent liberties with a child, Defendant appealed his sentence, arguing (1) the State breached the plea agreement by arguing against the recommended sentence in the agreement, and (2) the district court erred in determining the minimum prison term Defendant must serve before becoming eligible for parole and in including lifetime electronic monitoring in the journal entry of judgment. The Supreme Court (1) remanded the case to the district court for entry of a nunc pro tunc order deleting the reference to electronic monitoring in the journal entry, holding that the district court had no authority to impose lifetime electronic monitoring; and (2) affirmed the remainder of Defendant's sentence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.